Facile and Effective Phononic Structures for Ultrasound Focusing Application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasound therapy is a highly popular non-invasive method to treat diseases. It is desired to increase the resolution of ultrasound therapy, providing more efficient therapeutic effect. In this study, a simple but effective phononic structure was designed to achieve higher resolution close to wavelength resolution of ultrasound focusing. The objective of this study is to design a unique phononic structure to focus acoustic wave into human body more deeply and precisely. It is known that overheating by high frequency ultrasound will cause a series of side effects including bone burns, soft tissue burns, swelling and bleeding problems. In addition, due to the limited propagation of recovered evanescent wave, the penetration depth of acoustic energy being focused by the acoustic metamaterials is often hindered. In this study, we will design a multilayer acoustic metamaterial which shows sub-wavelength focusing ability at relatively low frequencies. More importantly, our design will also extend the ability of penetration depth by manipulating the focusing length through optimization of the phononic structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".