MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conducted EMI Consideration in Grid-Connected PV System Interface

2010· article· en· W2213334083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEU PVSEC · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEMIInterface (matter)GridPhotovoltaic systemElectrical engineeringElectromagnetic interferenceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In-situ conducted emissions measurement of the PV system connected to the grid, at different points within the system, has revealed the existence of an excessive EMI noise, originating from the building power utility and propagating toward the DC side of the inverter resulting in off building electromagnetic pollution. This paper investigates the effect of the impedance variation on the performance of the AC side EMI filter. It focuses on the conducted electromagnetic interference emissions generated in a building grid-tied PV power system. It emphasizes on the inverter AC side, including the building power grid, as being the interference source and the PV side as the victim circuit, having the inverter as the coupling path. The applicable standards of the grid-tied PV system as being a fixed installation are discussed. The conducted emissions waveforms are presented and the results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it