MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W221368130

[Inside the Academy & Out: Lesbian/gay/queer Studies & Social Action]

2000· article· en· W221368130 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Janice Andreae, Janice Ristock, Catherine G. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerLesbianSociologyGender studiesOppressionHuman sexualityIdentity (music)Sexual identityQueer theoryPoliticsHomosexualityMedia studiesAestheticsLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Janice L. Ristock and Catherine G. Taylor, eds.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998; 365 pp.Reviewed by Janice AndreaeEnglishYork UniversityToronto, OntarioJanice Ristock and Catherine Taylor's anthology, Inside the Academy and Out, emerged from the editors' conversations about their work on pedagogy and research. Despite different contexts, they struggled with questions about how represent identity without essentializing it and how reconcile the subversive, discursive strategies of queer theory with those motivated by the social activism of lesbian and gay identity politics and feminist analysis/organization against oppression. The subject continues occupy academics and others concerned with issues of representation and self-representation, signified by acts of naming, of coming out, in areas of practice that engage academics through pedagogy and research, and for some, social and political change. That the issue of naming even figured in the process of entitling this text, one [the editors] had thought might avoid the thickets of identity-specification on the book jacket, at least raises the question of their own dis/comfort with identifying themselves as queer. Their working title, Sexualities and Social Action: Inside the Academy and Out was abandoned when their editor instructed them, in a supportive way, get lesbian, gay, and queer studies into your title (p. x).Ristock and Taylor's intention for this text is be part of a highly contested social movement that aims change the way people think about sexuality and sexually categorized identities (p. x). It is also about the sometimes difficult, often self-reflective and unexpected journeys academics take as they struggle with issues of representation (and self-representation), and the attendant theoretical, political, social and personal implications -- risky terrain. The work of this text follows on previous contributions by Canadians, as noted in the preface, social, cultural and historical studies of the production and regulation of sexuality. The editors dedicate this text everyone struggling create queer spaces or to queer the in the heteronormative teaching locations of university and scholarly life. That statement barely suggests the debt such scholarship owes the unprecedented challenges, bravely undertaken in unfriendly university classrooms here and elsewhere, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, by lesbian, gay, and feminist scholars struggling make a safe space possible for queer studies.This text should be read in context with contributions by various Canadian scholars: for example, Linda Briskin's work on feminist, and more recently queer, pedagogy, particularly her 1990 CRIAW Feminist Perspectives document Feminist Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning Liberation; Didi Khayatt's portrayal of the homophobia faced by elementary and secondary educators in Lesbian Teachers: An Invisible Presence (1992); the numerous allusions James Miller makes in Fluid Exchanges: Artists, and Critics in the AIDS Crisis (1992) the struggles and triumphs of students participating in the groundbreaking program Aids and the Arts he began at the University of Western Ontario in 1988; the significant May 1993 international gathering of Queer academics, cultural practitioners and activists at the University of Toronto for the Queer Sites Conference organized by Julia Creet and Fadi Abou-Rihan; and RFR/DRF's own special issue of Passionate Ethics/Une ethique passionnee (vol. 25, nos. 3+4 [1997]), a collection of personal and critical responses the work of Kathleen Martindale, edited by Barbara Godard and Pamela McCallum, which takes up Martindale's struggle with questions about the future of queer pedagogy and the significance of deconstructing heteronormativity and in which contributors refer her studies of heterosexism in the classroom and her effort integrate lesbian and women's studies using feminist political strategies informed by postmodernist theories. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.492
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.078 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207