Qualidade de vida do idoso fragilizado e institucionalizado
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo Avaliar a qualidade de vida de idosos frágeis institucionalizados. Métodos Estudo transversal com a inclusão de 33 idosos frágeis e pré-frágeis, classificados a partir da Escala de Fragilidade de Edmonton. Foram aplicados: um instrumento para caracterização dos aspectos sociodemográficos e o instrumento World Health Organization Quality of Life for Older Persons para avaliação da qualidade de vida. Resultados Houve predomínio do sexo feminino (54,5%) e a média de idade foi de 76,8 anos (±9,3). Observou-se associação significativa entre a qualidade de vida e todas suas facetas, e houve forte relação entre qualidade de vida e “atividades passadas, presentes e futuras” (r=0,715; p<0,001). Conclusão A presença de fragilidade não interferiu diretamente na qualidade de vida de idosos e apresentou associação significativa com motivo de institucionalização.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it