MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2213851199

Simulation of Metal Electrodeposition Using the Kinetic Monte Carlo and Embedded-Atom Methods

2014· dissertation· en· W2213851199 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tanyakarn Treeratanaphitak

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKinetic Monte CarloMonte Carlo methodKinetic energyAtom (system on chip)Statistical physicsDynamic Monte Carlo methodMetalMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceMetallurgyMathematicsClassical mechanicsStatisticsParallel computing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of the microstructure of metal films on electric component performance and longevity have become increasingly important with the recent advances in nanotechnology. Depending on the application of the metal films and interconnects, certain microscopic structures and properties are preferred over others. A common method to produce these films and interconnects is through electrodeposition. As with every process, the ability to control the end product requires a detailed understanding of the system and the effect of operating conditions on the resulting product. To address this problem, a three-dimensional on-lattice kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) method is developed to conduct atomistic simulations of single crystal and polycrystalline metal electrodeposition. The method utilizes the semi-empirical multi-body embedded-atom method (EAM) potential that accounts for the cohesive forces in a metallic system. The resulting computational method, KMC-EAM, enables highly descriptive simulations of electrodeposition processes to be performed over experimentally relevant scales. \n \nIn this work, kinetically controlled copper electrodeposition onto single crystal copper under galvanostatic direct-current conditions and polycrystalline copper under potentiostatic direct-current conditions is modelled using the aforementioned KMC method. Four types of surface processes are considered during electrodeposition: deposition, dissolution, surface diffusion and grain boundary diffusion. The equilibrium microstructures from single crystal experiments were validated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations through the comparison of energy per atom and average coordination number. The growth mode observed is in agreement with experimental results for the same orientation of copper. MD simulation relaxes constraints and approximations resulting from the use of KMC. Results indicate that collective diffusion mechanisms are essential in order to accurately model the evolution of coating morphology during electrodeposition. \n \nIn the polycrystalline simulations, the effect of surface energy is taken into account in the propensities of deposition and dissolution. Sub-surface grain volume measurements were obtained from simulation results and the grain volume evolution with time is in agreement with both qualitative observations based on the deposit morphology and surface energy calculations. Simulations of polycrystalline deposition agree with findings from experimental studies that the evolution of the root-mean-squared roughness of the deposit during the early stages of deposition follows a power law relationship with respect to time $\\approx t^{n}$. Furthermore, the power law exponent on time is determined to be $n \\approx 0.5$, also in agreement with the experimental values reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207