Orner ou ne pas orner, la série des hommages publics aux Archives nationales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Louis XVIII prit en 1816 un décret soumettant tout hommage public à l’autorisation de l’État : les archives du bureau chargé du suivi de ces demandes font ici l’objet d’une étude globale en ce qui concernent les monuments commémoratifs (Arch. nat., sous-série F1c I). La recherche montre que les cas de censure avérée et militante sont rares, mais les dossiers permettent en revanche de percevoir les orientations et les influences qui affectent le mouvement général de la statuaire commémorative. En concentrant le propos sur la période antérieure à 1870, et particulièrement sur le Second Empire, on observer le mécanisme de ce contrôle. Après le Second Empire, on constate que, plus on avance dans la Troisième République, plus le nombre de décrets devient ridicule au regard du nombre de monuments effectivement érigés : le contrôle, s’il reste légalement obligatoire, devient dans la réalité très épisodique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".