M-machine, no-wait flowshop scheduling with sequence dependent setup times and truncated learning function to minimize the makespan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, learning effects have been studied as an interesting topic for scheduling problems, however, most researches have considered single or two-machine settings. Moreover, learning factor has been considered for job times instead of setup times and the same learning effect has been used for all machines. This paper studies the m-machine no-wait flowshop scheduling problem considering truncated learning effect in no-wait flowshop environment. In this problem, setup time is a function of job position in the sequence with a learning truncation parameter and each machine has its own learning effect. In this paper, a mixed integer linear programming is proposed for the problem to solve such problem. This problem is NP-hard so an improved genetic algorithm (GA) and a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm are developed to find near optimal solutions. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed procedures are tested against different criteria on various instances. Numerical experiments approve that SA outperforms in most instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it