La relation entre les connaissances et les attitudes concernant la diversité sexuelle chez les futurs enseignants au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude s’intéresse aux attitudes du futur personnel enseignant envers les personnes homosexuelles et bisexuelles, en lien avec ses connaissances sur la diversité des rôles et des comportements sexuels ainsi que sur les réalités des jeunes homosexuels et bisexuels des deux sexes. L’échantillon, composé de 82 étudiantes et étudiants québécois du Baccalauréat en enseignement secondaire, a été invité à remplir un questionnaire comportant deux échelles de 51 et 14 items afin d’évaluer respectivement leurs connaissances et leurs attitudes. Les résultats des analyses descriptives indiquent que le futur personnel enseignant a peu de connaissances sur les trois aspects évalués, et qu’il manifeste des attitudes plus ou moins positives envers les personnes homosexuelles et bisexuelles. De plus, les résultats des analyses corrélationnelles montrent qu’il existe une relation positive entre les connaissances sur les rôles et comportements sexuels et les attitudes de l’échantillon. Enfin, l’étude identifie des pistes relatives à la formation du personnel enseignant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".