The Emergence of Special Interest Associations in Collective Labour Relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the fundamental features of the legal regime of collective labour relations in North America lies in bestowing, by law, a monopoly of exclusive representation upon the trade union that wins the endorsement of the majority of employees.An analogy between this type of organization and our system of representative democracy has often been made in that the people’s representatives are also elected by majority rule. However, unlike parliamentary democracy, which formally allows for a margin of dissent to be expressed by representatives of the Opposition, the organization of collective labour relations fails to provide a similar forum to voice minority interests.Neglected by legislators, trade union dissent has traditionally only been able to express itself in the private circles of the trade union apparatus. However, a new phenomenon is slowly emerging in Quebec. Reacting against the wage concessions accepted by their trade unions in the wake of the government’s battle against budget deficits, young teachers, young police officers and young civil servants have established their own associations: the Association pour la defense des jeunes enseignants du Quebec (ADJEQ), the Groupe d’action pour l’equite et l’egalite salariale du SPCUM (GAPES) and the Association des jeunes de la fonction publique du Quebec (AJFP). These associations are using public forums, such as parliamentary commissions, to voice their demands. Furthermore, their web sites allow minority employees to express their discontent and grievances anonymously.These new groups reflect clearly the growing complexity of labour relations in our pluralist societies and the inherent difficulties of trying to reconcile collective rights and individual rights. In their own way, those associations are also expressing real dissatisfaction with the way trade union democracy is carried out in some work environments.The new associations may possibly be the result of a transient trend linked solely to the issue of the so-called “orphan” clauses, but the trade union movement would be ill-advised to disregard them. Rather, their emergence should incite trade union leaders to display greater openness, to begin dialogue and, more generally, to think about their conception of democracy and the underlying notion of equality, for such an approach has become necessary in the age of fundamental individual rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".