Les jeunes en bande et leurs parents. Les ressorts symboliques du détachement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’analyse du rôle des familles dans la formation des bandes de jeunes est l’objet d’un certain paradoxe. Le fonctionnement intrafamilial est davantage commenté, déduit, que directement observé en situation. Paradoxe qui rejaillit sur les interventions institutionnelles de plus en plus intrusives et contraignantes. L’une des explications réside sans doute dans les choix méthodologiques. La prédominance des approches statistiques a tendance à occulter des processus microsociologiques nichés dans les plis intimes des relations et de la symbolique familiales qui nécessitent des dispositifs d’observation ancrés. C’est l’objet de cet article qui vise à mettre en perspective le poids des représentations et des jugements moraux réciproques entre les jeunes en bande et leurs parents. Des analyses qui proposent de remettre en question, voire de renouveler, la manière dont la recherche s’interroge sur les facteurs familiaux de la délinquance juvénile, en particulier le phénomène des bandes de jeunes, et les théorise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".