MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2214607992 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-932-6_7

Reflections on Change Leadership in a Faith Based Teacher Education Program

2014· book-chapter· en· W2214607992 on OpenAlexaff
Kimberly Franklin

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithMythologyPower (physics)Leadership styleGood faithPolitical sciencePsychologySociologySocial psychologyPublic relationsPedagogyEpistemologyLawTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tension arises within me when I think about change leadership. Linking these words too closely implies that leadership is only about change. However, very often and very importantly leadership is about sustaining what is already present and good (Hargreaves & Fink, 2006). I also have concerns about how change is related to the modern myth of progress, as well as how change, even good change, can be the result of an abusive use of power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.456
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.026 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesFrench-language works237,207