MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2214656862

Complications of surgical extraction of ankylosed primary teeth and distal shoe space maintainers.

2012· article· en· W2214656862 on OpenAlexaff
Stacey Kirshenblatt, Kulkarni Gv

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDental Trauma and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolarMedicineAnkylosisPerforationDentistryOrthodonticsPrimary ToothCrown (dentistry)Mandibular second molarMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this report was to present the iatrogenic complications that may result from the management of ankylosed primary teeth as well as describe the case of a patient with an ankylosed primary mandibular left second molar which was surgically extracted and an adjacent primary first molar that was cemented with a distal shoe space maintainer. Aggressive surgical removal of the ankylosed tooth caused damage to the developing crown of the successor. Improper placement of the appliance caused perforation of the developing tooth follicle. Orthodontic therapy and a polycarbonate temporary crown were used to restore occlusion. Nonsurgical extractions and alternative appliances should be considered when treating patients with ankylosed primary second molars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDental Trauma and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207