Field study of residual forces developed in pre-stressed high-strength concrete (PHC) pipe piles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large-scale field testing program for the study of residual forces in pre-stressed high-strength concrete (PHC) pipe piles is presented in this paper. Five open-ended PHC pipe piles with 13 or 18 m in embedded length were installed and used for static loading tests at a building site in Hangzhou, China. All the piles were instrumented with fiber Bragg grating (FBG) strain gauges. The residual forces in these piles were recorded during and after installation. The measured load transfer data along a pile during the static loading tests are reported. The effect of the residual force on the interpretation of the load transfer behavior is discussed. The field data show that residual force along the installed pile increases approximately exponentially to the neutral plane and then reduces towards the toe. The residual force decreases with time to a stable value after pile jacking due to the secondary interaction between the pile and the disturbed soil around the pile and other factors. The large residual forces along the PHC pipe piles significantly affect the evaluation of the pile load distributions, and thus the shaft and toe resistances. The conventional bearing capacity theory tends to overestimate the shaft resistance at positions above the neutral plane and underestimate the shaft resistance at positions below the neutral plane, and the toe resistance for an open-ended PHC pipe piles founded in stratified soils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it