THE PODIFORM CHROMITE AND PLATINUM GROUP ELEMENTS IN THE NEOPROTEROZOIC OPHIOLITE BOU AZZER (INLIER BOU AZZER - EL GRÂARA, CENTRAL ANTI-ATLAS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromite deposits associated with ophiolites Bou Azzer correspond to podiform chromitites concentrated in the eastern part of the inlier Bou Azzer -El Grâara. They appear as small diamond-shaped body oriented and they cross a fracture system reflecting their implementation mode. Tectonics which affects the body is polyphase. Synchronous phase of their implementation is transtensive. This is evidenced by the forms of “pullaparts” common to the pods and breccia textures. Also, this was observed in metallographic microscope and SEM (scanning electron microscope), and earlier in serpentinization. This tectonic would also control the dyking system to which chromitite pods are associated. The distribution of the deposits along the inlier Bou Azzer shows a regional zonation, western chrome enrichment (52% Cr2O3), and a loss to the east (30% Cr2O3). The massive chromite is the chromite with a 62% in Cr2O3 and with enrichment in magnesium and trivalent iron depletion. Disseminated chromite can be divided into two types. The disseminated chromite podiform which is similar to the massive chromite geological context and the setting mode is relatively poor with Cr2O3 contents below 50%. The second type includes chromite and chromospinelles which are scattered in serpentine and in association with sulphides and nickel arsenides. It is by far the most widespread, but has an average content of 14%. Chromitites Bou Azzer are characterized by a low ratio [P-EL / I-PGE] typical ophiolitic chromitites alpine poor in sulfides, with predominance of IPGE, variable contents of Rh, and low levels of Pt and Pd. The sum of the contents (PGE) chromitites of Inguejem Ait-Ahmane is about 187-221 ppb. The microprobe analysis shows that the unaltered chromites Bou Azzer have little variable composition and are not aluminous Cr / Al> 1. The Cr2O3 content is high and ranges from 55.85 to 58.85%, while the TiO2 content is less than 0.20%, which allows them to be placed in the area of rich chromites Cr and poor chromites Ti.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".