MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W221476438

Aboriginal and Visible Minority Librarians: Oral Histories from Canada

2014· article· en· W221476438 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael Dudley

Bibliographic record

VenuePartnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisIndigenousWhite (mutation)Library scienceMedia studiesHistorySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lee, Deborah and Mahalakshmi Kumaran. Aboriginal and Visible Minority Librarians: Oral Histories from Canada. Toronto and New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. Print. 231 pp. 65.00 USD. ISBN: 978-1-4422-3681-3 (pbk.); 978-1-4422-3682-0 (ebook).Librarianship is such a white profession.This observation (made years ago by one of editor Deborah Lee's MLIS professors), underscores the need for-and importance of-Aboriginal and Visible Minority Librarians: Oral Histories from Canada. For a profession that ostensibly places a public premium on diversity, librarianship is still, overwhelmingly, a haven white privilege, particularly in Canada.This contradiction is especially acute as it pertains to Canada's troublingly few Indigenous librarians and was a major focus of the September 2014 meeting of the Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries at MacEwan University in Edmonton, Alberta. In attendance were most of the Indigenous librarian/authors featured in editors Lee and Kumaran's new book, including Camille Callison (Tahltan, University of Manitoba), Jessie Loyer (Cree-Metis, Mount Royal University), Kim Lawson (Heiltsuk-Kitasoo, University of British Columbia), and Mary Weasel Fat (Blood, Red Crow Community College), as well as Lee herself (Cree-Mohawk-Metis, Indigenous Studies Librarian, University of Saskatchewan).Most of the participants at that event-myself included-were non-Indigenous Canadians. Few First Nation children, we were told, have easy access to libraries or librarians, or think of librarianship as a career, and as a consequence retain (as one speaker put it) an unconscious suspicion of libraries, seeing them as just another form of Western infrastructure intended for the public good but one that nevertheless overlooks Indigenous world views.Other visible minority groups, too, are underrepresented in the profession: a 2005 report on the state of human resources in Canadian libraries found that their presence as professionals may be half of their actual demographic profile in Canadian society (8Rs Research Team 44-45).For all these inequities, however, too little attention has been paid in the Canadian library literature to this apparent lack of diversity in the profession. Not so in the United States: many decades now, the American library literature has devoted considerable attention to visible minority professionals, mostly African-American and Hispanic librarians. By contrast, the Canadian literature is rather meagre, mostly of recent vintage, and largely concerned with improving diversity in general rather than on exploring the experiences of professionals from identifiable racial and ethnic groups. Even the Canadian Library Association's 2008 (rather brief) Statement on Diversity and Inclusion refers only to patrons but makes no reference to the profession itself.With this new edited collection, Kumaran (originally from India) and Lee have done a tremendous service to the profession in filling this gap. They present a mix of personal narrative, scholarship, and career advice that will both empower and encourage aspiring Aboriginal and visible minority librarians and enlighten Euro-Canadian professionals as to the struggles they face. In fact, the diverse pathways to satisfying careers offered here would be of value to any library school student or new professional, regardless of racial or ethnic background.Beyond their previous publications in the professional literature, Lee and Kumaran (also from the University of Saskatchewan) have both made other noteworthy contributions: Lee as project leader since 2007 on the University's invaluable Indigenous Studies Portal (iPortal) and Our Legacy archive, and Kumaran on founding the Visible Minority Librarians of Canada (ViMLOC) Network through the Canadian Library Association.On offer in their new book is a selection of eighteen essays, nine from Aboriginal librarians and nine from librarians representing various immigrant groups from the Indian subcontinent, China, the Philippines, and Jamaica. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.023
Science and technology studies0.0600.009
Scholarly communication0.0150.004
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePartnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and ResearchSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207