MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2214939544 · doi:10.1109/tmscs.2015.2503282

Circuits for a Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropic (PMA) Racetrack Memory

2015· article· en· W2214939544 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerpendicularElectronic circuitMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsPhysicsNuclear magnetic resonanceGeometryMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with a so-called racetrack memory (also commonly known as a domain-wall memory). Novel circuits for implementing the write, the read, and the shift operations of a Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropic (PMA) based racetrack cell are initially introduced; the proposed circuits are very efficient in terms of numerous figures of merit, such as delay, power dissipation, and power delay product (PDP). These circuits also allow an efficient implementation of array-level operations of a racetrack memory. An extensive simulation-based analysis is also presented; features such as variations and SEU tolerance in the operation of a PMA-based racetrack memory are considered. This analysis shows that a racetrack memory has great potential due to the significant advantages that it offers for non-volatile storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it