MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sovereignty and Constitutional Power

2013· book· en· W2215365399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael P. Fitzsimmons

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2013
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionSuccessor cardinalSovereigntyQuarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)LawPolitical scienceHistoryPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most underappreciated legacies of the National Assembly is its achievement of an enduring constitutional tradition in France. In 1766, in the famous Session of the Scourging, Louis XV had quashed implicit constitutional arguments of the parlements and asserted that sovereignty belonged to him alone and that he did not owe any explanation for his exercise of it. Only a quarter-century later, however, his successor lost sovereign power and became a constitutional monarch. This chapter examines the sudden rise of the demand for a more than customary constitution and traces the manner in which the National Assembly ultimately attained this goal—an accomplishment so momentous that every subsequent regime in France has believed it necessary to legitimize its authority with a constitution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207