MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2215401745 · doi:10.5558/tfc2013-112

Monitoring of moisture content and basic specific gravity in black spruce logs using a hand-held MEMS-based near-infrared spectrometer

2013· article· en· W2215401745 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Guillaume Hans, Brigitte Leblon, Rod Stirling, Joseph Nader, Armand LaRocque, Paul Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoFPInnovationsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFPInnovations
KeywordsSpectrometerWater contentNear-infrared spectroscopyBlack spruceSpecific gravityMoistureMoldEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingChemistryMaterials scienceMeteorologyGeologyMineralogyPhysicsOpticsTaigaGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our study presents results of a test of a hand-held micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)-based near-infrared (NIR) spectrometer to estimate moisture content and basic specific gravity of black spruce frozen and unfrozen logs. The spectra were acquired on sapwood and heartwood as well as on tangential and transversal log sections. Partial least square regression was used to develop and validate the models that relate NIR spectral data to the log properties. Models were developed for the frozen and unfrozen logs separately (temperature-specific models) and for both kinds of logs together (generalized model). Both model types gave similar prediction accuracy and there were no temperature condition effects on the PLS model, for both moisture content and basic specific gravity estimation. This implies that the NIR spectrometer can be used whatever the log temperature conditions, even under freezing conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry ChronicleSame topicWood Treatment and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207