MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2215767598 · doi:10.4000/communiquer.333

Quelles limites territoriales pour une promotion métropolitaine ? Le cas de Rennes

2009· article· fr· W2215767598 on OpenAlexaff
Charles-Édouard Houllier-Guibert

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale de communication sociale et publique · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quand la communication publique se construit à partir d’un organisme qu’est une grande ville, elle doit s’adapter selon de nombreuses contraintes politiques, identitaires, idéologiques... La communication publique devient alors territoriale et peine à choisir l’échelle idéale pour porter des discours sur le développement métropolitain. Dans le cas de Rennes, l’un des pôles français qui a développé le plus d’échelles urbaines (du centre-ville à l’aire urbaine), le discours de communication tend à privilégier les échelles d’actions politiques auxquelles sont attachés les entrepreneurs d’image que sont les chargés de communication publique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale de communication sociale et publiqueSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207