MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2216239143 · doi:10.1115/omae2015-41953

Surface Temperature Fluctuations in Ice Indentation Tests

2015· article· en· W2216239143 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua D. Turner, Brian J. O’Rourke, Ian Jordaan, Rocky Taylor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermocoupleIndentationMaterials scienceComposite materialSpallRADIUSTemperature measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ice-structure interactions produce numerous, short-lived high pressure zones which transfer the majority of the load to the structure. Ice indentation tests have been used to observe the fluctuations in surface temperature at these zones. Previous investigations have shown that temperature fluctuates inversely to the applied load during cyclic loading. These fluctuations are believed to be due to rapid melting and refreezing cycles in the high pressure zones. A recent series of small-scale indentation tests investigated surface temperature fluctuations for indentor speeds at three orders of magnitude (0.21 mm/s to 21 mm/s). Freshwater granular ice specimens were grown in cylindrical steel moulds using seed ice and distilled water. A 70 mm diameter indentor with a radius of curvature of 89.6 mm was indented into the ice to depths between 10 and 15 mm. Seven thermocouples were installed in the indentor and made flush with its surface. These were used to measure the surface temperature of the ice during indentation. All tests took place at −10 degrees. Notable changes in temperature response were observed with changing speed. A steady increase in temperature was observed during low speed tests. Medium speeds lead to fluctuations in temperature due to the presence of spalling and cyclic loading that is consistent with the results of others. Some evidence of the inverse relationship between load and temperature can be observed in the highest speed tests, but the thermocouples sampling frequency was too low to accurately respond to high frequency loading and could not provide clear results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207