Interhemispheric Acute Subdural Hematoma: A Distinct Entity of Subdural Hematoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We wish to notify the readers on a rare case of interhemispheric acute subdural hematoma (ASH) who presented to our emergency department (ED) with a falx syndrome of contralateral hemiparesis in lower extremity and severe headache. A 25-year-old previously healthy man was involved in a traffic accident and presented to our ED with complaints of repeated vomiting and severe headache. On arrival to the ED, he had an initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 14 (opening her eyes with verbal stimuli, obeys commands, orientated) and normal vital signs (blood pressure: 130/85 mm Hg; heart rate: 86 bpm). No other injuries were noted. Neurological examination revealed mild weakness of the right lower extremity (strength score: 4/5). His routine blood tests, including complete blood counts, prothrombin time, and thromboplastin time were unremarkable. The plain films of the skull were normal. Non-enhanced cranial (CT) scan performed 4 h after the accident revealed a small left-sided acute interhemispheric subdural hematoma, which was posteriorly located (Fig. 1a). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain during the first 24 h after admission confirmed minimal ASH in the posterior interhemispheric fissure with subacute subdural hematoma in the left parietooccipital cortex and occipital regions (Fig. 1b). Considering the clinical condition of the patient, surgery was not planned by the neurosurgical department but the patient was kept under observation in the ED. He was discharged home 48 h after the trauma with a normal neurological examination and mild intermittent headaches. Interhemispheric ASH is a relatively uncommon type of ASH because of their unusual location [1]. They usually occur in patients with bleeding disorders and are associated with trauma in the majority of cases [2]. Computed tomography (CT) and MRI are important neuroradiological techniques for the accurate diagnosis of interhemispheric ASH [1, 2]. Although interhemispheric ASH is a rare form of subdural hematoma, early diagnosis and treatment is of great importance because of its emergent condition [2, 3]. CT and MRI are important diagnostic tools, as it was in this case. MRI may have the advantage rather than CT due to the absence of beam-hardening and multiplanar imaging. The best management modality for interhemispheric ASH depends upon the neurologic status on admission and clinical course [2]. If the patient is neurologically stable, conservative treatment is generally preferred. Surgical treatment is reserved in patients with disturbances of consciousness and for patients with progressive neurological deterioration [3].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".