MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2216786882 · doi:10.1109/vppc.2015.7352921

Converter Design for a Railway Voltage Booster Using Two Simulators

2015· article· en· W2216786882 on OpenAlexaff
Nina Naghizadeh, François Ruelland, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThévenin's theoremBooster (rocketry)SizingVoltageComputer scienceSoftwareElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringEquivalent circuit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a technique on how two simulators at different levels of abstraction can interact for the design and sizing of a booster power unit. The system is constituted by an ultracapacitor bank and a converter to boost voltage sags in a railway application. Full steps to determine Thevenin equivalent circuit of a dc railway is obtained based on exact modeling of the system components. Example of converter design as well as voltage and current profile of a typical network fed by energy storage system is discussed. Concluding simulation results show the performance of the software used to validate the railway load and the proposed technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRailway Systems and Energy EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207