MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2216941018 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2015.2496260

Energy-Efficient Adaptive Rate Control for Streaming Media Transmission Over Cognitive Radio

2015· article· en· W2216941018 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Jiang, Victor C. M. Leung, Hao Tang, Hongsheng Xi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceCognitive radioTransmission (telecommunications)Markov decision processComputer networkMarkov processMathematical optimizationWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In future mobile computing systems, cognitive radio (CR) emerges as a promising solution for alleviating spectrum shortage and satisfying the high bandwidth demand of multimedia streaming, while it presents tough challenges in provisioning user experience-perceived quality of service (QoS) and conserving transmission energy. In this paper, an adaptive rate control (ARC) scheme with the aid of the receive buffer is presented for energy-efficient transmission of streaming media over CR with QoS guarantee. The QoS metric, either display smoothness or transmission delay, is quantified by the state of the receive buffer. Cross-layer information is utilized to form a closed-loop feedback optimal control. A novel analytical model called event-driven discrete-time Markov control process is introduced to formulate the QoS-guaranteed energy-efficient ARC problem. Based on potential theory, a policy iteration algorithm that combines potentials estimation and stochastic approximation is proposed for finding the optimal policy online. By exploiting the system dynamics, this algorithm does not depend on any prior knowledge of channel availability or fading statistics, and it can converge to the global optimum with a low computational cost and reasonable speed. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207