MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2217024548 · doi:10.1115/icone16-48510

Numerical Simulation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in the Advanced CANDU® Reactor Endshield Using ANSYS-CFX and Porous Media Approach

2008· article· en· W2217024548 on OpenAlexaff
Khairy Khair, Saleh Baset, L Dimitrov, Julian Millard

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Fuel Cycle and High Level Waste Management; Computational Fluid Dynamics, Neutronics Methods and Coupled Codes; Student Paper Competition · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat transferMaterials scienceThermal conductionPorosityPorous mediumMechanicsBoiler (water heating)Electromagnetic shieldingComposite materialThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A distinguishing design feature of CANDU® nuclear reactors is the use of horizontal fuel channels housed in a horizontal vessel called the calandria vessel, which is made of stainless steel. The calandria vessel has two endshields (each consists of two tubesheets called calandria tubesheet and fuelling tubesheet), which provide supports for the fuel channels among other purposes. The two tubesheets of each endshield are joined by a series of stainless steels tubes called lattice tubes. The space within each endshield between the tubesheets and the outside of lattice tubes is filled with cooling water and carbon steel balls. Thus, the endshields provide shielding to reduce radiation reaching the fuelling machine vaults. Nuclear heat is generated within the endshields. Endshields also receive heat from the primary heat transport system by conduction through the fuel channel bearings, by conduction and radiation through the annular insulating gap for the lattice tubes, and by convection from feeder cabinet. Three finite volume models have been developed to simulate different aspects of the coupling between the fluid flow and thermal energy. In model 1, the whole space inside the endshield is modeled as double porous medium to represent the lattice tubes and the steel balls regions respectively. In model 2, the lattice tubes are modeled in details and a single porosity is used to model the space occupied by the steel balls only. This detailed model also predicts the temperature on the surface of the lattice tubes. The work presented in the paper shows that the results from both models are in good agreement. It also shows that the current design of the ACR® endshield cooling satisfies the design requirements with respect to the heat transfer to the shield cooling system during normal operation. Model 3 is used to predict temperature and flow behaviour under transient load service conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Fuel Cycle and High Level Waste Management; Computational Fluid Dynamics, Neutronics Methods and Coupled Codes; Student Paper CompetitionSame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207