The relationship between health related quality of life and disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between self-reported quality of life and disease activity, damage, impairment, disability, and handicap in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: In this cross sectional study disease activity was measured with the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), and damage by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) damage index (SDI). Quality of life was assessed by the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the EuroQol (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression was used to identify significant associations of patients' health status, and logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship of each of the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D in terms of impairment, disability, and handicap. RESULTS: Damage was associated with the Physical Function (PF) and Social Function subscales of the SF-36. Disease activity was associated with the General Health (GH) subscale. Ability to carry out usual activities was strongly related to PF and GH as well as to global rating of the thermometer rating scale of the EQ-5D. Role Physical (RP) and Bodily Pain (BP) of the SF-36 were also associated with the EQ-5D rating scale. In addition, patients' ratings of anxiety and depression were strongly related to the Mental Health (MH) summary scale of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Perceived health status of patients with lupus was associated with disease activity, damage, role physical, bodily pain, capacity for usual activity, and mobility. EQ-5D is a valid instrument for the measure of health related quality of life in SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".