MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2217337202 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v32i2.16343

What’s Next? Il lavoro dell’insegnante e le sue scelte nell’età dell’elettronica. Proceedings of a St. Michael’s College—Department of Italian Studies International Conference in the University of Toronto (October 21-24, 2008)

2012· article· en· W2217337202 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Francesco Guardiani, Roberta Sinyor

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Torunn Haaland concludes this collection with a study on Eco and films.According to Haaland, Eco recognizes in Fellini the authority in being able to transform reality into fantasy because he believes the recreation of illusionary reality is necessary in order to narrate in cinema.This instructive collection of essays is a further input in the open debate on Eco's wide range of works.It provides an interesting critical commentary on a variety of topics and it will generate supplementary attention and new perspectives on Eco's chameleon nature as a writer, historian, philosopher and linguist.Eco's intriguing works offer continuous opportunities for further analysis and elucidation and this collection may facilitate this undertaking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207