Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le traumatisme craniocérébral est une expérience déchirante pour les familles, mais aussi pour les professionnels de la santé qui vivent de l’impuissance face à la souffrance de la personne ayant le traumatisme craniocérébral et de ses proches. Le processus de deuil de la personne telle qu’elle était avant le traumatisme crânien et celui de leur vie antérieure est certes souffrant, mais s’accompagne d’un potentiel d’apprentissage et de croissance, tant pour les familles que les professionnels de la santé impliqués auprès d’elles. Une relation reposant sur le partage réciproque des savoirs et des expertises dans un rapport égalitaire est garante d’une relation satisfaisante, malgré une atmosphère chargée d’émotions. Le partenariat constitue en effet une stratégie intéressante qui permet de faire de ce moment de souffrance une expérience positive pour les familles et les professionnels de la santé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".