MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2217527593

ДИСТАНЦІЙНА ОСВІТА В УНІВЕРСИТЕТАХ: КАНАДСЬКИЙ ДОСВІД

2015· article· uk· W2217527593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovative Solutions in Modern Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Educational Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyPedagogyCurriculumProcess (computing)Higher educationSociologyInterpretation (philosophy)Distance educationProfessional developmentKnowledge managementPublic relationsPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the article the features of the Canadian system of distant education, which detected through synthesis and interpretation of existing scientific approaches to the definition of key concepts problems are concerned.Innovative approaches to distant education and the mechanisms of their implementation in Canadian universities with the new information and communication technologies usage in the students' learning process are grounded.The importance of ICT in shaping the new economy is emphasized.It is summed up that distant education provides a means to support teachers' professional development; curriculum ensures compliance demands and promotes logical sequence of accumulation of professional knowledge and skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.048
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it