MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid transport in fetal and adult sheep

2001· article· en· W2217664900 on OpenAlexaff
R. Mollanji, C. Papaiconomou, Melfort Boulton, Rajiv Midha, M. Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFetusCerebrospinal fluidLymphLymphatic systemGestationMedicineBolus (digestion)EndocrinologyInternal medicineChemistryAnatomyBiologyPathologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We quantified cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) transport (conductance) and CSF outflow resistance in late-gestation fetal and adult sheep using two methods, a constant pressure infusion method and a bolus injection technique into the lateral ventricles. No significant differences in CSF conductance (fetus 0.013 +/- 0.002, adult 0.014 +/- 0.003 ml x min(-1) x cm H(2)O(-1)) or CSF outflow resistance (fetus 83.7 +/- 9.8, adult 84.7 +/- 19.7 cm H(2)O x ml(-1) x min) were observed. To confirm CSF transport to plasma in fetal animals, (125)I- or (131)I-labeled human serum albumin (HSA) was injected into the lateral ventricles. The tracer entered fetal plasma with an average mass transport rate of 1.91 +/- 0.47% injected/h (n = 9). In two fetuses, we monitored the tracer appearance in plasma and cervical and thoracic duct lymph after injection of radioactive HSA into the ventricular CSF. As was the case in adult animals, fetal tracer concentrations increased in all three compartments over time, with the highest concentrations measured in lymph collected from the cervical lymphatics. These results 1) indicate that global CSF transport parameters in the late-gestation fetus and adult sheep are similar and 2) suggest an important role for extracranial lymphatic vessels in CSF transport before birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207