Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishAccording to Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor, heideggerian philosophy is characterized by its anti-subjectivism and its anti-humanism, which largely aligns it with a growingly rooted movement of our time, the ecological protest, pointing fundamentally, to the irreflexive growth of the technological society. However, following the author of Sources of the Self, the articles aim is to distangle the heideggerian position according to which it is possible to articulate a third way of foundation between the conflicting options present in the contemporary debate about these issues. catalaD'acord amb el filosof canadenc Charles Taylor, la filosofia heideggeriana es caracteritza pel seu antisubjectivisme i antihumanisme, la qual cosa l'alinea, en bona mesura, amb un moviment amb un arrelament creixent en la nostra epoca que es el de la protesta ecologica que apunta, fonamentalment, a l'irreflexiu creixement de la societat tecnologica. No obstant aixo, seguint l'autor de Sources of the Self, la intencio d'aquest article es desnuar la posicio heideggeriana segons la qual es fa possible articular un cami mitja de fonamentacio entre les opcions en pugna en el debat contemporani sobre aquestes questions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".