MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2218106841

The Music in Music Therapy-Psychodynamic Music Therapy in Europe: Clinical Theoretical and Research Approaches

2015· article· en· W2218106841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heidi Ahonen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMusic Therapy and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusic therapyPsychotherapistPsychodynamicsPsychologyPsychodynamic psychotherapyReading (process)Identity (music)PsychoanalysisAestheticsArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The in Therapy-Psychodynamic Therapy in Europe: Clinical, Theoretical and Research Approaches, edited by Jos De Backer and Julie Sutton. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2014. ISBN 978-1-84905353-2 (hbk); 978-0-85700-712-4 (ebk).The in Therapy-Psychodynamic Therapy in Europe: Clinical, Theoretical and Research Approaches offers the reader a wide range of perspectives on European approaches to practice. Editors Jos De Backer and Julie Sutton focus on the role of within addressing how vital musicianship is to the identity of therapists.My reaction when 1 field the book in my hand was that it would be about music in therapy approaches. The first part of the title, The in Therapy, refers to what Bruscia (1998) describes as in practices during which is used as a tool. The second part, Psychodynamic Therapy in Europe, refers to therapy. However, after reading the entire book, I find that it is not just about music in therapy practices; some of the articles describe processes that use as or psychotherapy processes that are not in nature. For this reason, I think the title of the book does not give a clear indication of the contents of the book. A more accurate title would have been Music and Therapy: Psychotherapy in This way the title would have included both in and as practices and all psychotherapy theories that are represented in the book. psychotherapy refers to all psychotherapeutic approaches; refers only to approaches.In my opinion, the pronounced strength of the book is clearly the insightful and noteworthy clinical case material. It was captivating to read the case studies and to see how the different authors reflected upon them. However, as is typical with article collation books, the weakness of this book is the lack of cohesion between different chapters. It is as if it contains different authors' conference presentations and papers instead of invited articles on carefully pre-selected topics. The individual chapters are all remarkable, thought-provoking, and very well written, but they do not seem linked with each other, and the synthesis and integration across chapters is missing. Also confusing is the fact that some of the articles clearly do not present perspectives.After an introductory chapter, this book is organized into three parts: Part 1 (Chapters 2-4) introduces the context for in Europe; Part 2 (Chapters 5-18) introduces clinical and research perspectives; and Part 3 (Chapters 19-21) deals with continuing professional development. The following is a brief summary of the content.Part 1: The Context for Therapy in EuropeAs a context for in Europe, the book presents three articles. In Chapter 2, the editors along with Monika Nocker-Ribaupierre provide a historical perspective of the European Therapy Confederation (EMTC). This is very interesting read and brings up many good memories. After all, I represented Finland in the EMTC from 1993 to 2001 before I moved to Canada.In Chapter 3, De Backer and Sutton first introduce theoretical perspectives of therapy. I think it would have made more sense if they had only included an overview of therapy. Instead, they also introduce developmental, behavioural, Gestalt, cognitive, systemic, humanistic, eclectic, and psychosocial theories as examples of the main approaches in Europe. Instead of focusing on the title of the book, psychodynamic therapy, they also introduce Creative Therapy, physiological behavioural medical and musical healing models (pp. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.407
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.033 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of music therapySame topicMusic Therapy and HealthFrench-language works237,207