MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2218285805 · doi:10.1109/ias.1993.299143

Automatic power management of desktop computers

2002· article· en· W2218285805 on OpenAlexaff
Dale K. Tiller, D. Phil, Guy R. Newsham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionPower consumptionEmbedded systemSoftwareOperating systemReduction (mathematics)Power managementPersonal computerPower (physics)Computer hardwareField (mathematics)Computer graphics (images)Electrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that many desktop personal computers and peripherals are left on when they are not being used, wasting energy. The authors monitored desktop computer use patterns on 33 machines using custom activity monitoring software, and predicted a reduction in mean computer energy consumption of 71% with a 36% reduction in mean peak power demand, if computers were automatically switched off after 60 minutes of inactivity. Field trials of an automatic power management system designed to switch off computers and peripherals after a specified period of inactivity produced reductions in mean computer energy consumption of 63%, with a reduction in mean peak power demand of 35%; visual display unit mean energy consumption was reduced by 82%. All these savings were maintained with time.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207