MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2218396260 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2012-0059

Nuclear organization of RNA polymerase II transcription

2013· review· en· W2218396260 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Scott Davidson, Neil Macpherson, Jennifer A. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
KeywordsTranscription factoriesRNA polymerase IITranscription (linguistics)BiologyChromatinGeneral transcription factorTranscription factor II DTranscription coregulatorGeneticsTranscription factor II FCell biologyGeneRNA polymeraseGene expressionPromoterRNAChromatin remodeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcription occurs at distinct nuclear compartments termed transcription factories that are specialized for transcription by 1 of the 3 polymerase complexes (I, II, or III). Protein-coding genes appear to move in and out of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) compartments as they are expressed and silenced. In addition, transcription factories are sites where several transcription units, either from the same chromosome or different chromosomes, are transcribed. Chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the interphase nucleus with active genes preferentially positioned on the periphery or even looped out of the territory. These chromosome territories have been observed to intermingle in the nucleus, and multiple interactions among different chromosomes have been identified in genome-wide studies. Deep sequencing of the transcriptome and RNAPII associated on DNA obtained by chromatin immunoprecipitation have revealed a plethora of noncoding transcription and intergenic accumulations of RNAPII that must also be considered in models of genome function. The organization of transcription into distinct regions of the nucleus has changed the way we view transcription with the evolving model for silencing or activation of gene expression involving physical relocation of the transcription unit to a silencing or activation compartment, thus, highlighting the need to consider the process of transcription in the 3-dimensional nuclear space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207