Bibliographic record
Abstract
others, between the "fabulous" swarming, endlessly gestating forms of the real, what Malroux can term the "spirale de l'amour" ceaselessly weaving its stunning intricacies, and the all too visible bruisings and degradations that proliferate, too, upon the "face" of the earth."Barbeles de l'histoire", she finally apostrophizes, "un autre visage affleureffroue d'eclats".The face of the cosmos, something larger than each of us yet available within us, visible or intuitable within "orchid" and "bee" too, a face we share and, perhaps, create•.• None of this should be thought to be either a naIve pipe dream -according to the discourse of wheel-spinning cynicism -or a reverdissement achieved without traversing the paths of self-doubt and anxiety.Reverdir is the work of a mature mind and a tried heart; it is prepared to give confidence to ecology and ontology rather than compound problem by insisting upon it; and, manifestly, this is the work of a person thinking through the physical to its manifest non-mechanistic, non-physical centre or platform of viability.Soleil dejadis is termed by Alain Borer in his preface, "[un] tres singulier chant d'experience", for it, too, is a book lived, breathed, felt -far from theory, far from sheer intellection, far too, I should argue, from any wilful aestheticisation bypassing "presence" to the advantage of "closure", as Bonnefoy might say.ReciJ-poeme, as Borer calls it, Soleil dejadis narrates the patchwork of childhood memories that testify to a no-time at the heart of that hard and harsh temporality we so credit, yet which the poem, memorial though it may be, simultaneously refutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".