MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2218881374

Trusted Data in IBM's Master Data Management

2011· article· en· W2218881374 on OpenAlexaff
Przemyslaw Pawluk, Jarek Gryz, Stephanie Hazlewood, Paul van Run

Bibliographic record

VenueDatabases, Knowledge, and Data Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIBMComputer scienceMaster dataData qualityQuality (philosophy)Data warehouseProcess (computing)Data governanceData modelingDatabaseProcess managementData scienceOperating systemEngineeringOperations management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A good business data model has little value if it lacks accurate, up-to-date customer data. This paper describes how data quality measures are processed and maintained in IBM InfoSphere MDM Server and IBM InfoSphere Information Server. It also introduces a notion of trust, which extends the concept of data quality and allows businesses to consider additional factors, that can influence the decision making process. The solutions presented here utilize existing tools provided by IBM in an innovative way and provide new data structures and algorithms for calculating scores for persistent and transient quality and trust factors. Keywords-Master Data Management; Data Integration; Data Quality; Data Trust

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.611
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDatabases, Knowledge, and Data ApplicationsSame topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207