Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poster presented at EuroScipy 2014. Toolboxes for modeling auditory perception have a surprisingly long history, starting with the Auditory Toolbox, first written by Malcom Slaney for Mathematica, in 1993, and then ported to Matlab in 1998. Here we present the Python Auditory Modeling Toolbox (PAMBOX), an open-source Python package for auditory modeling. The goal of the toolbox is to provide a collection of components that can be easily combined and extended to solve auditory modeling problems. PAMBOX contains code for modeling cochlear filtering, envelope extraction, as well as modulation processing. The toolbox also includes speech intelligibility models. These models are commonly used to predict how well speech is understood in a given situation, such as in the presence of noise or reverberation. The intelligibility models use a simple and consistent "predict" API, inspired by scikit-learn's "fit and predict" API. This simplifies comparisons across models. PAMBOX also includes a framework for performing intelligibility experiments compatible with IPython.parallel. Models that are not original to PAMBOX are validated against their original implementations, where available. PAMBOX is based on NumPy, SciPy, and Pandas. It is distributed under the Modified BSD License.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.158 | 0.101 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".