Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he capitalist grasp of western society infiltrates even the most intimate moments, shaping desires, relationships, and bodies in its relentless pursuit of profit.Sexuality is fashioned into commodities that range from pornography and sex toys to labiaplasty and performance enhancing pills (Fahs 281).These products not only involve a transfer of money, but also move the consumer towards an 'ideal' sexuality that is represented in the media through advertisements, movies, and music videos.In recent years, a new type of sexual commercialization has emerged.'Seeking Arrangement' is a website that facilitates the search for a 'mutually beneficial relationship' between Sugar Babies and Sugar Daddies.These relationships typically involve younger women seeking the company of older, wealthy men who will provide them financial aid in return for 'companionship.' In order to survey this unexplored territory, it is pertinent to begin by examining the social climate surrounding the development of this phenomenon.A discussion of the experiences of sex workers and clients will be used to establish the place of emotional intimacy in sex work.This discussion will be supplemented by an examination of the 'normalization' of the sex industry and 'new market morality.' Following this, a discourse analysis of user comments on the website Seeking Arrangement is provided.The discourse analysis shows that the dominant construction of sugar relationships involves a personal and sexual connection that is facilitated by the commodification of emotional intimacy.This type of emotionally intimate relationship is viewed positively by users, but also succumbs to the reproduction of gender inequality and the stigmatization of sex work. I. Untangling Intimacy and Commodity in the Sex IndustryThe relationships facilitated by Seeking Arrangement typically involve two aspects: (1) intimacy in sex work, and (2) consumption of sexuality.Once a theoretical framework for these elements is established, they will be synthesized into an analytical framework that can be applied to the sugar phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".