MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220159512 · doi:10.1504/ijista.2015.072222

Self-tuning fuzzy logic PID controller, applications in nuclear power plants

2015· article· en· W2220159512 on OpenAlexaff
Harsh Deol, Hossam A. Gabbar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPID controllerControl theory (sociology)Settling timeOvershoot (microwave communication)Fuzzy logicControl engineeringControl systemFuzzy control systemController (irrigation)EngineeringSelf-tuningComputer scienceTemperature controlStep responseControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents intelligent control design using self-tuning fuzzy logic control technique. The proposed adaptive control design is used to maintain system parameters to be within design limits, which provided means to improve the efficiency of the overall control system. The proposed self-tuning control system is applied on breathing air control systems in nuclear power plant which was recommended to maintain system pressure within design limits. System dynamics were studied, transfer functions were built and controlling parameters were established to develop system model in Simulink. Relationship to system pressure, steady-state error, Kp, Ki and Kd was studied and used to build fuzzy controller. Controller was implemented and simulation results demonstrated that self-tuning fuzzy PID controller has better control, precision and performance in maintaining system pressure with reduced overshoot, rise time, settling time and steady state error compared against conventional PID controller. Fuzzy PID controller also proved to be huge cost saver for the company in long run.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and ApplicationsSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207