MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220251362

퀘벡 현대시의 태동과 문예지의 역할

2014· article· ko· W2220251362 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
한대균

Bibliographic record

VenueEtudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en France · 2014
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPoetryEthnologyLiteratureSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saint-Denys Garneau publie en 1937 Regards et Jeux dans lespace. Cest le seul recueil dont il ait autorise la parution en faisant partie du groupe qui fonde La Releve, revue qui sinteresse a la litterature, a lart et a la religion. Avec la fondation de cette revue la poesie quebecoise commence a parler du gou?t litteraire ou culturel de lindividu plu?tot que les angoisses ou les desirs de la collectivite. Chez Saint-Denys Garneau les modeles classiques sont abandonnes au profit du vers libre. Cest la naissance dun nouveau langage poetique. Dans les numeros de La Releve on peut lire les premiers poemes dAnne Hebert qui a ete influencee par Saint-Denys Garneau. Mais ses poemes ont souvent parus dans les revues comme Le Canada francais et La Nouvelle Revue canadienne. Anne Hebert publie son premier recueil de poemes au debut des annees 1940. Ce ne sera quavec son deuxieme recueil, en 1953, quelle simpose vraiment. Le Tombeau de rois donne a lire un langage mai?trise. Roland Giguere fonde et anime lui-me?me les Editions Erta en 1949. Il y publie ses recueils et des livres dautres poetes qui sinteressent au surrealisme. En effet, chez lui linfluence du surrealisme est decisive dans sa poesie comme dans sa vie en tant quediteur. Il introduit ainsi ce courant litteraire dAndre Breton dans la poesie quebecoise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEtudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en FranceSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207