MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220444182 · doi:10.3968/7946

Research of Seepage Flow Law of Tight Oil Reservoir in North Songliao Basin

2015· article· en· W2220444182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaodong Shi, Chi Ai, Jianfei Zhan, Qianhua Xiao, Chaoyang Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight oilPetroleum engineeringGeologyStructural basinOil productionPetroleum reservoirFlow (mathematics)Foundation (evidence)Geotechnical engineeringLawGeomorphologyPaleontologyMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tight oil resources in north Songliao basin is rich and abundant, which is the most important energy sources foundation of Stable and raising oil production in Daqing oilfield. However, it is difficult to develop such oil resources by the regular ways and has no economic benefit for the poor reservoir property and thin reservoir thickness. Using the way of horizontal well by volume fracturing can reach the high oil production, which has showed good results up till now. But now tight oil in Daqing oilfield exploration and development is still in its infancy, the pore structure and seepage flow law of tight oil reservoir in north Songliao basin is not clear, which is potential barrier for exploring tight oil reservoirs effective development mode. Tight oil reservoir single phase and two phase fluid seepage rule are researched by means of theoretical and experimental, the results of which can provides a reliable theoretical basis for tight oil reservoir developed effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207