MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220566469

Study on the Relationship Between Emotion Tropism and Expressivity of College Students and Their Mental Health

2015· article· en· W2220566469 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoyan Deng, Xiao Lü

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHostilityPsychologyHappinessFeelingAffect (linguistics)AnxietyInterpersonal relationshipClinical psychologyMental healthExpressivityCorrelationSocial psychologyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of scaling is adopted to study the relation between emotional tropism (consisting of positive and negative affective variables), emotional expressivity and mental health by doing questionnaires from 263 college students in Chongqing City. The differences test shows that: (a) Males express more negative affect than females and are not as good as women in expressing their feelings, but no significant gender differences in positive affect and feeling of happiness is observed; and freshmen share more feeling of happiness than seniors, but no significant differences between grades in their expression of positive or negative affect and emotions are observed; (b) Correlation analysis shows that feeling of happiness and other positive affect have significant negative correlation with most of the psychological symptom factors, while negative affect have significant positive correlation with all the psychological symptom factors; and emotional expressivity shows significant negative correlation with interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, depression, anxiety and other factors; (c) Regression analysis further shows that negative affect exerts significant regression effect on obsession, interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety, hostility, bigotry and other factors, and emotional expression exerts regression effect on interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, depression, anxiety and other factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207