Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este art?culo se examinar? la manipulaci?n de los recursos convencionales del romance tanto formales como ideol?gicos, en La gitanilla, con el prop?sito de descubrir la subversi?n sistem?tica de los mismos por Cervantes. Espec?ficamente, demostraremos que los mismos lugares comunes del romance, muchas veces citadas para comprobar el convencionalismo art?stico e ideol?gico de las Novelas ejemplares, una vez examinados con cuidado, se revelan como formas de subversi?n de las modalidades convencionales del g?nero que s?lo superficialmente representan. Los conceptos de realismo e idealismo, o la hibridaci?n gen?rica que podr?an producir relatos herm?ticos en lo que a su interpretaci?n se refiere, son insuficientes para explicar y comprender el producto subversivo final del autor. Postulamos que Cervantes ense?a a sus lectores la conexi?n ?ntima que hay entre forma literaria e ideolog?a, y que el romance, art?stica y moralmente hablando, es un c?digo narrativo exhausto. Esperamos que esta lectura de la manipulaci?n ir?nica de los recursos del romance en La gitanilla suscite una reconsideraci?n de las Novelas ejemplares como obra unitaria. Us?ndola como punto de partida, concluiremos que Cervantes desarrolla en su novela introductoria un modelo de subversi?n sistem?tica de las convenciones literarias e ideol?gicas de romance que se puede emplear como r?brica para la interpretaci?n de toda la colecci?n. The topic of Cervantes's manipulation of generic literary styles and forms in the Novelas ejemplares is a seemingly endless source of critical discussion. Scholars writing about them have pointed to the pastoral, chivalric, Byzantine, picar esque, and the Italian novella as basic structural, thematic, and stylistic patterns resonating throughout them. Joseph Ricapito has argued in favour of the Italian model,1 but other authors have reminded us that Cervantes favoured the Byzantine narrative - a more obvious point, made by citing Cervantes's prologue to the Novelas ejemplares in which he writes that his Persiles will compete with Heliodorus - while some critics have attempted to categorize Cervantes's novelas in the more generic terms of romance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".