MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220845557

Methodological Aspects of the Theory of Objectification

2015· article· pt· W2220845557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectivas da Educação Matemática · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObjectificationEpistemologySketchMaterialismReflexivityDialecticSociologyPerspective (graphical)Activity theoryEmbodied cognitionSemioticsFocus (optics)Dialectical materialismCultural studiesPsychologySocial sciencePedagogyComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I focus on the methodology of a specific theory of teaching and learning: the theory of objectification. Inspired by dialectical materialism and Vygotsky’s psychology, the theory of objectification posits the goal of Mathematics Education as a dynamic political, societal, historical, and cultural endeavour aimed at the dialectical creation of reflexive and ethical subjects who critically position themselves in historically and culturally constituted and always evolving mathematical discourses and practices. In the first part, I briefly sketch the general lines of the theory. In the second part, emphasizing the semiotic and embodied nature of teaching and learning, I discuss the methodology of the theory, stressing in particular its task design, data collection, and data analysis components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.349
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it