MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2221346159

Are Poor Really Poor in Pune City

2010· article· en· W2221346159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandard of livingQuarter (Canadian coin)PopulationPer capita incomeBusinessPer capitaPopulation growthEconomic growthBoomDeveloping countryAgricultural economicsEconomicsGeographySocioeconomicsLabour economicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The India’s economy is experienced boost of 8.6% growth rate by industrial production and services in the first quarter of the year 2010. The cities which are contributing to this growth rate majorly are Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Bangaluru, Hyderabad and Pune. This paper concentrates on, the effects of the above said growth on the poor of the Pune city. The city is not only developing because of the boom in IT sector but also growth in agro-business and manufacturing industry. This has not only increased per capita income which is currently Rs. 46,000/-, the highest in country but also has helped raise the living standards of the unskilled labour force. To show this effect a primary survey was conducted which reflects that the living standard of the labour class has gone up, which gives a clear indication for the rise in migrant population in the city. The study reflects that the migrant population is hand in hand in contributing to the tax generation by the Municipal, which in turn is planning to invest INR 1,960 million by 2011-12 on land use and development planning purpose. This will generate huge employment opportunities for unskilled labour residing in the cities slums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207