MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W22214874

LA UNIVERSIDAD PÚBLICA ESPAÑOLA: DISEÑO DE UN SISTEMA DE COSTES

2003· article· en· W22214874 on OpenAlex
Mercedes Cervera Oliver

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTécnica contable · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The observation and debates concerning the coexistence of depression and schizophrenia date back to Kraepelin and Bleuler. Both recognized that among the basic symptoms of 'dementia praecox' and "schizophrenia", are the flattening of affect and the depressed affect and both included in their clinical descriptions of schizophrenia the depressive symptoms. During the recent years this observation has been made official, with the inclusion of diagnoses like schizoaffective psychosis as well as the post psychotic or post schizophrenic depression in the international disease categorization systems DSM and ICD. Several theories have been proposed to explain the relation of depression and schizophrenia, especially when there both appear simultaneously in the same patient. Depression can be present during the prepsychotic prodromal phase, during the acute phase or after the remission of the psychotic features. In addition depressive symptoms could be part of the clinical picture of chronic stabilized patients. Depression in schizophrenia is defined in different ways, i.e. through the criteria of DSM and ICD, through the relevant items of psychopathological scales or through the total rating of depression scales if the score exceeds a certain cut-off. Since the existing depression scales have been created to evaluate depressed patients and therefore there were questions of validity of their use in schizophrenic patients, recently it has been proposed a special scale to evaluate depression specifically in schizophrenic patients (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia). This scale has been standardized in a Greek sample. In general, according to the existing studies 7-70% of all schizophrenic patients suffer from some form of clinically relevant depression and the median frequency from all the available studies is 25%. The frequency of depression in new schizophrenic patients is 21-24% during the acute phase and it seems that this frequency progressively decreases with the time and stabilizes around 8% in remitted patients. These frequencies may vary upwards depending on the definition of depression. One in four schizophrenic patients with depression presents with suicide ideation and therefore requires appropriate identification and management. As far as predisposing factors for the appearance of depression concerns, the existing data are inadequate and contradictory to extract safe conclusions and therefore further research is in line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it