MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2221537736 · doi:10.1115/ipack2015-48243

Thermal Spreading Resistance in a Multilayered Orthotropic Circular Disk With Interfacial Resistance and Variable Heat Flux

2015· article· en· W2221537736 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuri S. Muzychka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthotropic materialIsotropyThermal resistanceMaterials scienceHeat fluxHeat sinkInterfacial thermal resistanceMechanicsThermal conductivityBoundary value problemThermal contact conductanceThermalSpreading resistance profilingComposite materialHeat transferMathematical analysisMechanical engineeringMathematicsPhysicsThermodynamicsOpticsEngineeringFinite element methodSiliconOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal spreading resistance in a multilayered orthotropic disk is considered. Interfacial resistance between each layer is prescribed by means of a contact conductance hc using a Robin type boundary condition. Orthotropic properties are considered by transforming the orthotropic system into an equivalent isotropic system using stretched coordinates. A recursive modeling approach is presented to account for the effects of two or more layers in the structure from the simple case of a single isotropic layer. This approach simplifies the analysis considerably. Finally, variable heat flux distribution is considered for three special cases: uniform, parabolic, and inverse parabolic. Numerous special cases can be derived from the general result including perfect interfacial contact and perfect sink plane conductance. Additional issues are also discussed in detail. The expressions for the total thermal resistance and spreading resistance can be easily implemented in any mathematical software or coded in Fortran, C, or BASIC. Since the method is strictly analytical, thermal analysts can quickly assess changes in layer properties, material sequence, heat flux distribution, and effects of interfacial contact resistance, with little extra effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207