MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2221651894

Estudio de costos y causas de la rotación de personal técnico del área de Well Testing en la empresa Sertecpet S.A.

2015· dissertation· es· W2221651894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Moya Pardo, Daniel Alfonso

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Management and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurnoverWelfare economicsAffect (linguistics)Order (exchange)Job dissatisfactionQuarter (Canadian coin)Data collectionBusiness administrationPsychologyManagementOperations managementBusinessJob satisfactionEconomicsSociologyGeographyFinanceSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study's main objective is to determine the main causes that exist in the turnover in the company Sertecpet SA and if turnover costs affect the utility. The research consists of five parts, introduction to the problem, background, problem, hypothesis, theoretical framework, assumptions of the author and the author's course was analyzed; in the second part of the process of review of the literature it was developed; in the third part it focused on the methodology and research design, ie research tools and sources of data collection; in the quarter, data analysis, results and finally in the fifth part the conclusions and recommendations presented were developed. The results obtained in this investigation determined that the main causes of turnover, job dissatisfaction is the lack of benefits, career plans, emotional wages and low pay. With this background the importance of knowing exactly what causes that affect staff turnover and costs in order that management and headquarters establish preventive measures to solve the problems is concluded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganizational Management and InnovationFrench-language works237,207