MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2222085426 · doi:10.3917/rfp.795.1609

Qu’est-ce que rêver pour l’enfant ? Le familier et l’inquiétant du sexuel infantile

2015· article· fr· W2222085426 on OpenAlexaff
Elsa Schmid-Kitsikis

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de psychanalyse · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur évoque l’inquiétante familiarité qu’exprime l’enfant à propos du rêve à travers le statut psychique de l’extériorité/intériorité, de l’illusion, de l’image, du dédoublement, du lien à la curiosité sexuelle et à l’étrangeté que l’enfant éprouve dans la saisie du vécu imagé évanescent du rêve. Étrangeté malgré une production onirique aux contenus familiers, alors que le travail de la pulsion et de la pensée organisent l’imaginaire de l’enfant à l’instar des contes et des mythes. Elle révèle un sexuel infantile en lien avec le regard vers soi et vers l’autre, la place psychique qu’occupent les yeux du rêve et leur éprouvé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de psychanalyseSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207