Qu’est-ce que rêver pour l’enfant ? Le familier et l’inquiétant du sexuel infantile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur évoque l’inquiétante familiarité qu’exprime l’enfant à propos du rêve à travers le statut psychique de l’extériorité/intériorité, de l’illusion, de l’image, du dédoublement, du lien à la curiosité sexuelle et à l’étrangeté que l’enfant éprouve dans la saisie du vécu imagé évanescent du rêve. Étrangeté malgré une production onirique aux contenus familiers, alors que le travail de la pulsion et de la pensée organisent l’imaginaire de l’enfant à l’instar des contes et des mythes. Elle révèle un sexuel infantile en lien avec le regard vers soi et vers l’autre, la place psychique qu’occupent les yeux du rêve et leur éprouvé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".