MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2222126165

THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN TRAUMA PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2006· article· en· W2222126165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Menuka Bhandari, Jason W. Busse, Pamela Leece, Olufemi R. Ayeni, Beate Hanson, Emil H. Schemitsch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatizationPopulationMedicinePsychoticismAnxietyQuality of life (healthcare)Symptom Checklist 90Psychological interventionClinical psychologyPsychiatryPsychologyPersonalityBig Five personality traits
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little is known about the psychological morbidity associated with orthopaedic trauma. Our study aimed to determine the extent of psychological symptoms and whether patient psychological symptoms were predictive of outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. Overall, trauma patients experienced higher intensity of psychological symptoms than population norms. Psychological symptoms, patient age, and ongoing litigation predicted functional outcomes. Patients may benefit from early interventions by social workers and psychologists to process their psychological states post injury. Little is known about the psychological morbidity associated with orthopaedic trauma. Our study aimed to determine the extent of psychological symptoms and whether patient psychological symptoms were predictive of outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. All patients attending ten orthopaedic fracture clinics at three University-affiliated Hospitals were approached for study eligibility. All consenting patients would be requested to complete a baseline assessment form, a 90-item symptom checklist-90R (SCL-90R), and the Short-Form–36. The SCL-90R constitutes nine dimensions (Somatization, Obsessive-compulsive, Interpersonal sensitivity, Depression, Anxiety, Hostility, Phobic anxiety, Paranoid ideation, Psychoticism) and three global indices (Global severity index, Positive symptom distress index, positive symptom total). We conducted regression analyses to determine predictors of quality of life among study patients. Of two hundred and fifteen patients, 59% were male at a mean age of 44.5 years. Over half of patients had lower extremity fractures. Trauma patients experienced greater psychological symptoms than population norms. Overall, trauma patients experienced higher intensity of psychological symptoms than population norms. Patient functional outcomes were predicted by patient age, ongoing litigation, and Positive Symptom Distress. This model predicted 21% of the variance in patient function. Patient somatization was an important psychological symptom resulting in increasing intensity of symptoms. Smoking, alcohol, open fracture, surgeons’ perception of technical outcome, level of education, and time since injury were not predictive in this model. Psychological symptoms, patient age, and ongoing litigation predicted functional outcomes. Patients may benefit from early interventions by social workers and psychologists to process their psychological states post injury. Funding: This study was funded in part by research grants from AO North America and Regional Medical Associates, McMaster University. Dr. Bhandari was funded, in part, by a 2004 Detweiler Fellowship, Royal Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Dr. Busse is funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship Award.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→