Light Emission as a Probe of Energy Losses in Molecular Junctions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visible light emission was observed for molecular junctions containing 5-19 nm thick layers of aromatic molecules between carbon contacts and correlated with their current-voltage behaviors. Their emission was compared to that from Al/AlOx/Au tunnel junctions, which has been previously attributed to transport of carriers across the AlOx layer to yield "hot carriers" which emit light as they relax within the Au contact. The maximum emitted photon energy is equal to the applied bias for the case of coherent tunneling, and such behavior was observed for light emission from AlOx and thin (<5 nm) molecular junctions. For thicker films, the highest energy observed for emitted photons is less than eVapp and exhibits an energy loss that is strongly dependent on molecular layer structure and thickness. For the case of nitroazobenzene junctions, the energy loss is linear with the molecular layer thickness, with a slope of 0.31 eV/nm. Energy loss rules out coherent tunneling as a transport mechanism in the thicker films and provides a direct measure of the electron energy after it traverses the molecular layer. The transition from elastic transport in thin films to "lossy" transport in thick films confirms that electron hopping is involved in transport and may provide a means to distinguish between various hopping mechanisms, such as activated electron transport, variable range hopping, and Poole Frankel transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".